| Message ID | 20250625-drm-dsi-host-no-device-ptr-v1-12-e36bc258a7c5@bootlin.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers |
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 337BF2F3C3F for <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.197 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750869962; cv=none; b=ssf7AJd7Ywq3p0lgi8SIWr0Z/zHugQZUT7zJDjBUrJVs3exJ3EBlEHITJESjd8XQqRNM5XwivYHjr4rhQOfgqraoiTIO8psj7mPwbpbsHcmof+ZcJSB2VLnCxKosia39AslNNKPNt5jVrKQH+NrOKs409GjvriQlfATV9aJKlww= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750869962; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1ZxuD9ArotDKGeccKG/W3puoI8zipvhGpvT0iWc7EX4=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=ILOGPs1snrgCxdjlgCboKTNz8P7wn8Uqp8NTUKHL5FUBP/c+wulFvRHMPTkK2th3dtSVZbGTZ6B8MRw10SNj/jN0jrbLK/ru3r8eXNErhoX6b8d0CIgkX9fsaEs/bOtNBlsaILZxDlCAGZo8gtP4cDA69F8GERTmNgcE0FSbelk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=DK8HfmfB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="DK8HfmfB" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E81D044386; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1750869959; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dCQjC3bxYvAsR76L+Ka0VGOBlYXbT49K68X3RUdoAdE=; b=DK8HfmfBZWaC1d4Xl9TmPw8w0zs26U5m8UpD5e4SJPeyWi2ix67ZtacUhw7fi1bdv8Jmmf UIodYCi1+2o9+5a/zgz5UT4MKF2Vrx8t/RDmv7qUmQ8iaLoEMCEEeZy0+7dGp+8iyPp7Yu 4zRVlbfiTZIxCDB1e1700B09fNLR4J020PiyFGIZaOebaX9uWkGbWzMIe+vCphyrZeQ/JI RePyDThjA+NE1ZUhQpkZe2YkdpGh6HxgNeVEhDau9KX0Qp8MUHsLbSeIEf3OWrnB43X3M8 vCEx0lcq/sZnOYTzD+FeCbwgoHjbSUhOy+xky16JLpbNbJeGzmYxtrVmMXjgHA== From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:45:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH RFC 12/32] drm/meson: dsi: remove unneeded DSI device check Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: <linux-sunxi.lists.linux.dev> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-sunxi+subscribe@lists.linux.dev> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20250625-drm-dsi-host-no-device-ptr-v1-12-e36bc258a7c5@bootlin.com> References: <20250625-drm-dsi-host-no-device-ptr-v1-0-e36bc258a7c5@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20250625-drm-dsi-host-no-device-ptr-v1-0-e36bc258a7c5@bootlin.com> To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org> Cc: Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@gehealthcare.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddvgddvfedvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfitefpfffkpdcuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephfffufggtgfgkfhfjgfvvefosehtjeertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnuhgtrgcuvegvrhgvshholhhiuceolhhutggrrdgtvghrvghsohhlihessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieeiuedvffetgfeuudelheeutefggfejieettdetteekueeuueeukeevvedvueevnecukfhppedvrgdtvdemieejtdemvddtvddtmegvrgdtudemsggvgedumeelhegvjeemfeegfeemledufegvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepuddtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvrgdtvdemieejtdemvddtvddtmegvrgdtudemsggvgedumeelhegvjeemfeegfeemledufegvpdhhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddujeekrdejhegnpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheplhhutggrrdgtvghrvghsohhlihessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvdeipdhrtghpthhtohepjhhonhgrsheskhifihgsohhordhsvgdprhgtphhtthhopehthhhomhgrshdrphgvthgriiiiohhnihessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdhsuhhngihisehlihhsthhsrdhlihhnuhigrdguvghvp dhrtghpthhtohepmhdrshiihihprhhofihskhhisehsrghmshhunhhgrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhfohhssheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgrrghrthgvnhdrlhgrnhhkhhhorhhstheslhhinhhugidrihhnthgvlhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehkhhhilhhmrghnsegsrgihlhhisghrvgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehnvghilhdrrghrmhhsthhrohhngheslhhinhgrrhhordhorhhg X-GND-Sasl: luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com Status: O |
| Series |
drm/mipi-dsi: avoid DSI host drivers to have pointers to DSI devices
|
|
Commit Message
Luca Ceresoli
June 25, 2025, 4:45 p.m. UTC
This check is not really needed: there is no reason the detaching client
can be different from the attached one. Should this happen, that would be a
bug elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
---
**NOTE**: I'm not 100% sure this is correct, but it appears so, and other
drivers have no such check. And anyway it appears that such a check should
belong to the core, not to individual drivers. Comments welcome!
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c index 66c73c512b0e68ff0e9dbbfaba5f8bf2d347e6b1..4dc726cef5455075def7927a469ae23020ebfec7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c @@ -252,11 +252,6 @@ static int meson_dw_mipi_dsi_host_detach(void *priv_data, { struct meson_dw_mipi_dsi *mipi_dsi = priv_data; - if (device == mipi_dsi->dsi_device) - mipi_dsi->dsi_device = NULL; - else - return -EINVAL; - return phy_exit(mipi_dsi->phy); }