[v2,5/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: a523: add CPU clocks

Message ID 20260917223913.1855301-6-andre.przywara@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers
Series arm64: allwinner: a523: Enable CPU clocks |

Commit Message

Andre Przywara Sept. 17, 2026, 10:39 p.m. UTC
The Allwinner A523 family of SoCs feature a separate clock unit for the
CPU PLLs and muxes, including one for the DSU interconnect.

Add a DT node for the CPU clock controller, and list all the clocks from
the other CCUs that this controller needs.
Also list the clock source for each CPU: there is one clock for each
cluster of four cores, suffixed L and B, for little and big (although
all cores are of the same Cortex-A55 type).

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
  

Comments

sashiko-bot@kernel.org Sept. 17, 2026, 10:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] dt: sun55i-a523: incorrect #reset-cells in cpu_ccu
- [Low] dt: sun55i-a523: clock-names mismatch pll-periph0-600M
--

commit e064b2e2cf12882a6bab40a91b6eb61a493b3e06
Author: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

arm64: dts: allwinner: a523: add CPU clocks

The Allwinner A523 family of SoCs feature a separate clock unit for the CPU
PLLs and muxes. This patch adds a DT node for the CPU clock controller and
lists the required clocks and sources for each CPU.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi
> index 85ef492ffeae7..29af21372aba2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi

[ ... ]

> @@ -1144,5 +1153,18 @@ npu: npu@7122000 {
>  			resets = <&mcu_ccu RST_BUS_MCU_NPU>;
>  			power-domains = <&ppu PD_NPU>;
>  		};
> +
> +		cpu_ccu: clock-controller@8817000 {
> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun55i-a523-cpu-ccu";
> +			reg = <0x08817000 0x80>;
> +			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&rtc CLK_OSC32K>,
> +				 <&rtc CLK_IOSC>, <&ccu CLK_PLL_PERIPH0_2X>,
> +				 <&ccu CLK_PLL_PERIPH0_600M>;
> +			clock-names = "hosc", "losc",
> +				      "iosc", "pll-periph0-2x",
> +				      "pll-periph0-600M";

[Severity: Low]
Will this clock name cause a validation regression during dtbs_check?

In the cpu_ccu node of arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi, the
device tree uses pll-periph0-600M. This matches the driver, but the YAML
binding strictly expects pll-periph0-600m.

This case mismatch will fail validation when running make dtbs_check.

> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;

[Severity: Low]
Does this introduce a regression in the DT description by erroneously declaring
cpu_ccu as a reset controller provider?

The #reset-cells = <1> property in the cpu_ccu node describes it as a reset
controller, but the hardware and driver do not provide resets.

This appears to be satisfying a flawed YAML binding that erroneously mandates
it globally for all compatibles.

> +		};
>  	};
>  };
  

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi
index 85ef492ffeae7..29af21372aba2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun55i-a523.dtsi
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ 
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/sun55i-a523-ccu.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/sun55i-a523-mcu-ccu.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/sun55i-a523-r-ccu.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun55i-a523-cpu-ccu.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/reset/sun55i-a523-ccu.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/reset/sun55i-a523-mcu-ccu.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/reset/sun55i-a523-r-ccu.h>
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@  cpu0: cpu@0 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x000>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_L>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -32,6 +34,7 @@  cpu1: cpu@100 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x100>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_L>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -39,6 +42,7 @@  cpu2: cpu@200 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x200>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_L>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -46,6 +50,7 @@  cpu3: cpu@300 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x300>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_L>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -53,6 +58,7 @@  cpu4: cpu@400 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x400>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_B>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -60,6 +66,7 @@  cpu5: cpu@500 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x500>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_B>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -67,6 +74,7 @@  cpu6: cpu@600 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x600>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_B>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 
@@ -74,6 +82,7 @@  cpu7: cpu@700 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			reg = <0x700>;
+			clocks = <&cpu_ccu CLK_CPU_B>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 		};
 	};
@@ -1144,5 +1153,18 @@  npu: npu@7122000 {
 			resets = <&mcu_ccu RST_BUS_MCU_NPU>;
 			power-domains = <&ppu PD_NPU>;
 		};
+
+		cpu_ccu: clock-controller@8817000 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun55i-a523-cpu-ccu";
+			reg = <0x08817000 0x80>;
+			clocks = <&osc24M>, <&rtc CLK_OSC32K>,
+				 <&rtc CLK_IOSC>, <&ccu CLK_PLL_PERIPH0_2X>,
+				 <&ccu CLK_PLL_PERIPH0_600M>;
+			clock-names = "hosc", "losc",
+				      "iosc", "pll-periph0-2x",
+				      "pll-periph0-600M";
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			#reset-cells = <1>;
+		};
 	};
 };